|
›
Current Issue
|
›
Volume 5, December 2004
Archive:
›Volume
24, 2015
›Volume
23, 2014
›Volume
22, 2014
›Volume
21, 2013
›Volume
20, 2013
›Volume
19, 2012
›Volume
18, 2012
›Volume
17, 2011
›Volume
16, 2011
›Volume
15, 2010
›Volume
14, 2010
›Volume
13, 2009
›Volume
12, 2009
›Volume
11, 2008
›Volume
10, 2008
›Volume
9, 2007
›Volume
8, 2007
›Volume
7, 2006
›Volume
6, 2005
›Volume
5, 2004
›Volume
4,
2001
›Volume
3, 2000
›Volume
2, 1999
›Volume
1, 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Poetics of
the Film Body: Docility, Molecular Fundamentalism and Twenty
First Century Destiny |
|
SUSAN FLYNN
|
University of the Arts, London
|
Abstract |
|
Twenty first century film evokes a new topology of the
body. Science and technology are the new century’s
‘sovereign power’ which enforces biopolitics through bodies
which, by virtue of being seen at their most fundamental
level, have become docile surfaces. The film body is at once
manipulated and coerced into an ethos of optimization; a
thoroughly scientific and ‘molecular’ optimization which
proffers ‘normalization’ and intimately regulated bodies. In
the film bodies of this millennium, bodily intervention
results in surveillance becoming internalized. Now the body
is both a means and an end of social control. This essay
applies the philosophies Michel Foucault and Nikolas Rose to
twenty first century Hollywood film, elucidating a new
tropos, a new film body/body of film.
Keywords:
Hollywood, Michel Foucault, Nikolas Rose, science fiction,
body theory, molecular science, biotechnology, disability |
|
BACK
|
|
|