|
›
Current Issue
|
›
Volume 5, December 2004
Archive:
›Volume
23, 2014
›Volume 22, 2014 ›Volume 21, 2013 ›Volume
20, 2013
›Volume
19, 2012
›Volume
18, 2012
›Volume
17, 2011
›Volume 16, 2011
›Volume 15, 2010
›Volume 14, 2010
›Volume 13, 2009
›Volume 12, 2009
›Volume 11, 2008
›Volume 10, 2008
›Volume 9, 2007
›Volume 8, 2007
›Volume 7, 2006
›Volume 6, 2005
›Volume 5, 2004
›Volume 4,
2001
›Volume 3, 2000
›Volume 2, 1999
›Volume 1, 1999
›Volume 1, 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Talk of
contracts”: Gift-giving vs. Reciprocity in James Joyce’s “A
Mother” |
|
CAMELIA RAGHINARU |
Concordia University, Irvine
|
|
Abstract |
|
This essay measures the extent to which gift-giving fails
in an economy of reciprocity. Reading James Joyce’s story “A
Mother” in terms of Derrida’s notion of the gift as
“absolute loss,” I consider the implications of an economy
of loss for Joyce’s notion of sacrifice. Thus, I argue that
the absence of an economy of sacrifice integrating “absolute
loss” engenders the zero-sum game at the heart of
Dubliners. I depart from other readings of the short
story in the context of an economy based on the ideal of
balanced reciprocity, since these versions deny the pure
gratuity of gift in its connotations of sacrifice and loss.
While such theories form a good starting point for analyzing
the “moral economy” of Dubliners, they tend to
overlook the fact that the only means to counteract the
paralysis resulting from reciprocity is through the
suspension of the economy of exchange.
Keywords:
Jacques Derrida,
The Gift of Death, exchange, reciprocity, paralysis, loss, profit, James Joyce,
Dubliners, gift, class, usury |
|
BACK
|
|
|