http://www.ulbsibiu.ro
http://www.ulbsibiu.ro/ro/facultati/litere/

 

› Current Issue

  
  › Volume 5, December 2004
Archive:
 
Volume 23, 2014
 ›Volume 22, 2014
 ›Volume 21, 2013
 ›
Volume 20, 2013
 ›Volume 19, 2012
 ›Volume 18, 2012
 ›Volume 17, 2011
 ›Volume 16, 2011
 ›Volume 15, 2010

 Volume 14, 2010
 ›
Volume 13, 2009
 ›Volume 12, 2009
 ›Volume 11, 2008
 ›
Volume 10, 2008
 ›Volume 9, 2007
 ›Volume 8, 2007

 Volume 7, 2006
 Volume 6, 2005
 Volume 5, 2004
 Volume 4, 2001
 Volume 3, 2000
 Volume 2, 1999
 Volume 1, 1999
 Volume 1, 1999

 
 

 

Lacan Frames Scorsese’s Paintings in The Age of Innocence

 

PAULA ANCA FARCA

Colorado School of Mines

 

Abstract
 

This article, which brings together film, psychoanalysis, literature, and art, focuses on the role of paintings in Martin Scorsese’s The Age of Innocence (1993). Scorsese conveys the imprisonment of New York aristocrats within the framework of social conventions and their evasions of social restrictions through his employment of paintings. Because the protagonists’ emotions are not revealed often, the director communicates their dramas and actions with the help of the paintings they own or appear next to. The paintings operate as Jacques Lacan’s Other, an entity that watches over the characters to make sure they conform to its self-perpetuating rules. Scorsese’s use of paintings shows that the characters perform for the Other and seek to maintain the status quo. While most characters perform within a Lacanian symbolic order, their different responses to a variety of paintings underscore the flexibility of the symbolic order.

 

 

Keywords: Martin Scorsese, Jacques Lacan, Edith Wharton, The Age of Innocence, adaptation, the Other, symbolic order, gaze, paintings, performance, desire
 

BACK