|
›
Current Issue
|
›
Volume 5, December 2004
Archive:
›Volume
23, 2014
›Volume 22, 2014 ›Volume 21, 2013 ›Volume
20, 2013
›Volume
19, 2012
›Volume
18, 2012
›Volume
17, 2011
›Volume 16, 2011
›Volume 15, 2010
›Volume 14, 2010
›Volume 13, 2009
›Volume 12, 2009
›Volume 11, 2008
›Volume 10, 2008
›Volume 9, 2007
›Volume 8, 2007
›Volume 7, 2006
›Volume 6, 2005
›Volume 5, 2004
›Volume 4,
2001
›Volume 3, 2000
›Volume 2, 1999
›Volume 1, 1999
›Volume 1, 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lacan Frames
Scorsese’s Paintings in
The Age of Innocence |
|
PAULA ANCA FARCA
|
Colorado
School
of Mines
|
Abstract |
|
This article, which brings together
film, psychoanalysis, literature, and art, focuses on the
role of paintings in Martin Scorsese’s The Age of
Innocence (1993). Scorsese conveys the imprisonment of New York aristocrats within the framework of
social conventions and their evasions of social restrictions
through his employment of paintings. Because the
protagonists’ emotions are not revealed often, the director
communicates their dramas and actions with the help of the
paintings they own or appear next to. The paintings operate
as Jacques Lacan’s Other, an entity that
watches over the characters to make sure they conform to its
self-perpetuating rules. Scorsese’s use of paintings shows
that the characters perform for the Other and seek to
maintain the status quo. While most characters perform
within a Lacanian symbolic order, their different responses
to a variety of paintings underscore the flexibility of
the symbolic order.
Keywords:
Martin Scorsese, Jacques Lacan, Edith
Wharton, The Age of Innocence,
adaptation, the Other, symbolic order, gaze, paintings,
performance, desire |
|
BACK
|
|
|