|
›
Current Issue
|
›
Volume 5, December 2004
Archive:
›Volume
20, 2013
›Volume
19, 2012
›Volume
18, 2012
›Volume
17, 2011
›Volume
16, 2011
›Volume
15, 2010
›Volume
14, 2010
›Volume
13, 2009
›Volume
12, 2009
›Volume
11, 2008
›Volume
10, 2008
›Volume
9, 2007
›Volume
8, 2007
›Volume
7, 2006
›Volume
6, 2005
›Volume
5, 2004
›Volume
4, 2001
›Volume
3, 2000
›Volume
2, 1999
›Volume
1, 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Becoming
Animal, Becoming Others: What We Make with Art and
Literature |
|
KARIN COPE |
Nova Scotia College of Art and Design University in Halifax |
|
Abstract |
|
What is poetry for?
How does poiesis or making – the Greek root of the
words poetry and poetics – succeed in moving us, in getting
under our skins? “Becoming Animal” argues that art and
literature are crucial zones of play, transformative modes
that work by mixing up self and other, inside and out,
human, animal and other matter. The essay moves from a
consideration of D.W. Winnicott’s psychoanalytic discussion
of the relationship between play and creativity, self and
other, to Howard Searles’ investigation of transference and
counter-transference as possible models for engaged and
sensuously attuned critical stances. The last section of the
essay offers an account of the “transgenic” work of Eduardo
Kac, which literally mixes genetic material as art. The
essay concludes by arguing that art, as poiesis,
works by engaging us in constant contact with what is not
ourselves as a process of becoming ourselves; it argues that
such ‘self-estrangement’ is the way we sort out how to live
an ontologically rich and ethically meaningful life.
Keywords: art, becoming
animal, Kac, Milner, play, poiesis, Searles, Stein,
Winnicott, transference, counter-transference, transgenesis |
|
BACK
|
|
|