|
› Volume 17, 2011
|
›
Volume 5, December 2004
Archive:
›Volume 16, 2011
›Volume 15, 2010
›Volume 14, 2010
›Volume 13, 2009
›Volume 12, 2009
›Volume 11, 2008
›Volume 10, 2008
›Volume 9, 2007
›Volume 8, 2007
›Volume 7, 2006
›Volume 6, 2005
›Volume 5,
2004
›Volume 4,
2001
›Volume 3, 2000
›Volume 2, 1999
›Volume 1, 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Split Modernity: Elements for a
Cosmopolitan Theory in Stephen Toulmin’s
Cosmopolis |
|
GABRIEL C. GHERASIM
Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj Napoca
Abstract
Developed in
the comprehensive form of a
theory of rationality,
Stephen Toulmin’s work
brings forth a
series of elements
situated at the
intersection of the
history and
theory of science
with the
history of ideas.
Understood in this
way, Toulmin’s
books display a marked
critical spirit, a capacity for
synthesis and
narrative passion. His
endeavour as such
is both
risky and bold at
the same time:
risky, because
such a historicist
approach is more
often than
not subject
to a certain
type of perspectivism that
allows the
narrative discourse
to develop
according to specific
intellectual stakes; bold, as
his work
opens up
the possibility for
the re-evaluations
and reconsiderations
that are peculiar to
this type of
approach which
has had a
long history in
the academia. The present
article unpacks
cosmopolitan theory
starting from the
critique that
Toulmin directs at
modernity, foregrounding
the fact
that a cosmopolitan theory
is primarily
developed as a solution
that is more
effective than idealistic
when it comes
to overcoming a specific
crisis of modernity.
Keywords:
cosmopolitanism, theory of modernity, theory of science, epistemology,
rationality, crisis, stability, Stephen Toulmin
|
|
BACK
|
|
|