|
› Volume 17, 2011
|
›
Volume 5, December 2004
Archive:
›Volume 16, 2011
›Volume 15, 2010
›Volume 14, 2010
›Volume 13, 2009
›Volume 12, 2009
›Volume 11, 2008
›Volume 10, 2008
›Volume 9, 2007
›Volume 8, 2007
›Volume 7, 2006
›Volume 6, 2005
›Volume 5,
2004
›Volume 4,
2001
›Volume 3, 2000
›Volume 2, 1999
›Volume 1, 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative Proximity in the Work of
Nelson Algren |
|
DOUGLAS COWIE
Royal Holloway, University of London
Abstract
Recent critics of the work of Nelson Algren have often worked themselves into
the tricky situation of having to “restore” or “recuperate” Algren. Such
restorative approaches become concerned with justifying interest in, or arguing
for the significance of, their subject. But while this “defensive” approach may
go some way to carving out and preserving a critical space for Algren, rarely
does it point towards or embark upon new and productive critical pathways.
Moreover, while much of the available criticism on Algren is thematic in focus,
few critics have considered Algren’s narrative technique.
My article joins an incipient narratological conversation about Algren, arguing
that no thematic account can be complete without a nuanced consideration of his
narrative technique. I call Algren’s particular brand of free indirect discourse
“narrative proximity.” This term encapsulates what I consider the fundamental
interlacing of Algren’s aesthetic and social visions; it therefore has deeply
ethical implications. Furthermore, “narrative proximity” denotes a technique
whereby the very inarticulateness of his characters is rendered profoundly
articulate.
Keywords:
Nelson Algren, narrative technique, free indirect
discourse
|
|
BACK
|
|
|